Letter from the Hennepin County Sheriff's Cooperation with ICE
In September I received a very disturbing letter dated September 21 from the Hennepin County Sheriff, Richard W. Stanek outlining the County's close cooperation with the Department of Homeland Security and its Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) division. It appears to confirm some of our worst fears about what has been happening at the County Jail for decades now and I believe it should give us cause to reconsider, renegotiate and potentially terminate the contract we, the City of Minneapolis, has with them to serve as our jail.
=====================
September 21, 2017
City Hall, Room 331
350 South 5th Street
Minneapolis, MN 55415
Dear Mayor Hodges and Councilmembers,
A
number of representatives from cities in Hennepin
County have made inquiries about immigration issues and about proposed sanctuary
city resolutions. I welcome the opportunity to address these issues and write to provide information about the Sheriff’s Office operations and a county law enforcement perspective on the question
of sanctuary cities.
Immigration is a federal
issue, and immigration violations are civil in nature, not criminal.
Accordingly local law enforcement officers
in Minnesota do not enforce immigration laws only federal
law enforcement officers
are empowered to enforce immigration laws. The Sheriff's Office makes no determination of a person's
immigration status during resident contacts, at the time of jail booking,
or while an inmate is in custody.
And
because immigration violations are civil and not criminal,
the Sheriff’s Office has no legal authority to detain an inmate once their criminal
charges have been resolved by the Courts. This
is why we cannot honor
ICE detainer requests- the Courts have been
very clear: to do so would violate an individual's 4th Amendment Rights.
Accordingly, there is not one inmate in the Hennepin County Jail being held solely on immigration violations.
I'm
sure you may have heard me say it: there is no sanctuary for criminals anywhere
in Hennepin County.
Here's specifically what I mean by this, especially in the context of a proposed sanctuary
resolution:
Every arrestee brought to our Jail is alleged
by a law enforcement officer
or judge to have connnitted a criminal act, so we are required
to book and maintain custody
of the arrestee until they are released or transferred pursuant
to an order of the Hennepin County District Court, or
some other court.
The
vast majority of the arrestees
who come to our Jail prior to criminal charging
have been arrested by local police departments, and not the Hennepin County Sheriff’s Office. Please see
the
enclosed chart which shows the 2016 arrests
made by law enforcement agency and by type of arrest. The Sheriff’s Office made approximately 26% of the arrests leading
to booking in 2016, and 90% of our arrests
were made pursuant
to a court order. The other 74% of arrests
leading to booking
(23,247 of31,537) came from other agencies
operating in the County.
At the point of booking,
Minnesota law requires
that we ask each arrestee
their "place of birth." Every inmate also is fingerprinted, the prints are sent to the BCA, which sends them to the FBI
and then to the Department of Homeland Security
and ICE. ICE's District Office in Bloomington
conducts an independent review based on the information from booking, based on interviews,
and
based on its own records
and databases. We do not assist ICE in this process, but we do cooperate with ICE officers to the fullest extent of the law. If an arrestee
voluntarily discloses that they were foreign
born, or a non-U.S. citizen,
HCSO makes this information available
to ICE, arranges a call to ICE, and offers the arrestee the option of speaking with an immigration
agent. In 2016, we arranged
approximately 2700 of these phone calls, and the majority
of the calls resulted in inmates voluntarily speaking with ICE agents. For most (80%), this call assisted them in resolving questions
concerning their legal status.
We
notify ICE when an
inmate is released only when ICE previously
has served a Request for Notification. In 2016, we received 267 "Requests for Notification" (for 0.85% of inmates) and ICE actually
picked up 68 inmates after their release
(0.2% of all inmates booked in the Hennepin County
Jail). We do not decide which inmates
ICE picks up, and ICE never reports back on the status or result of their immigration proceedings.
The above process is followed every time an officer in your police department makes an arrest and brings an individual
to our Jail. Should your city decide to adopt a sanctuary
city policy, the process at our Jail will remain unaffected, because
the state and federal mandates
for our Jail will continue.
The only way to adopt a true sanctuary would be to instruct your police
department to either not make arrests, or to cite and release
all suspects.
While I take no position with respect to a sanctuary
city policy for your city, and respect
your authority as a
policymaking body, as the chief law enforcement officer in the county, I hope that you will consider the public safety consequences of any policy adopted in a city that would limit in
any way the law enforcement officers in your police department
from fulfilling their duties and abiding
by their Oath of Office.
Finally, because immigration is a federal
issue, please consider
joining with me in calling upon our Minnesota Congressional Delegation to address the many concerns of our constituents and work toward making the policy reforms that can only be addressed at the federal level.
Please feel free to contact me if you have
any questions about these matters
or any other. Thank you for your public
service to the residents.
Sincerely,
Richard W. Stanek
Hennepin County Sheriff