IRV passes Council

By -
It's an amazing, historic day.

Today the Council referred Instant Runoff Voting to the Charter Commission to be placed on the ballot this November.

Going into the meeting, we IRV supporters knew we had just enough votes: seven Council Members (myself, Samuels, Glidden, Schiff, Remington, Benson and Hodges) had signed on to the measure to refer IRV to the Charter Commission.

Amazingly, the final vote was 11-1. The seven supporters were joined by CMs Hofstede and Colvin Roy (neither of whom voted for the measure in the IGR committee) and Goodman. Only President Johnson voted against the measure.

Congratulations to Jeanne Massey, Tony Solgard, FairVote Minnesota, the Better Ballot Campaign and the Minneapolis/5th District Green Party, which has been advocating for this for years. It was great to see Jeanne, Tony, Bill Barnett, Jim Cousins, Tim Jordan, Leif Utne and others from the campaign and the Green Party at the Council meeting today. When the final vote was taken today in the Council Chambers many (probably all) of them stood up and applauded.

On a personal note, I am espeically thrilled by the astounding progress that electoral reform has made since I first got interested in it over 10 years ago. I remember participating in a small study circle at Matthews Park on alternative voting methods in the mid-90s with Tony, John Kolstad, Ken Bearman, Dave Shove, Diane Hinderlee and others. I recall well gathering signatures in both of the previous campaigns to put IRV on the ballot (1997 and 2001). I have advocated for the system every time I've run for office and worked to make it something we use in Party elections and a top priority for the Greens.

After all this work over the years, hearing again and again how IRV would be great but it just can't happen in Minneapolis, I can hardly believe this ringing mandate from the City Council. It's a great day.

While there is still more work to be done to get this passed by the voters in November, as well as work on other important reforms like campaign finance reform, bringing ranked choice voting to the state and national levels and implementing proportional representation, let's be sure we take time to celebrate this significant, major milestone.

Thanks to everyone who has worked on this. Congratulations.

Comments

Eddie said…
I am not sure IRV is such a great thing. It will be very expensive to initiate and will eliminate the city's primary which means the general election ballot could be filled with who-knows how many cranks and others who would have to be "ranked" by the voter. Additionally it will be confusing for voters and likely lead to more ballot errors and frustrated voters. A political scientist on NPR yesterday called IRV "a solution in search of a problem" and I tend to agree. I understand that the city's own election office is not very supportive of this method at all and that the legislature may not even allow it to be implemented. In short, we does the city need IRV when we already have fair and open elections that elect a diversity (within the Minneapolis liberal culture) of candidates?
8:16 AM
Eddie said…
Minneapolis is a charter city. But a city has only the powers given to it by the state. The Legislature could abolish the city of Minneapolis, merge it with St Paul, change its boundaries or eliminate its charter. This is because a city is nothing but a creation of the state. The Legislature could easily override IRV as they elimiated the city's resident requirement for cops a few years ago.
2:56 PM
Eddie said…
Additionally, I didn't say "spoiled" ballots, I said ballot errors and frustrated voters. The machine will certainly catch the error, but the voters will make them and will be frustrated by having to make new ballots.
2:59 PM
Anonymous said…
You raise an interesting point. why did Hopkins abandon IRV?
8:35 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Lessons from Mr. Smith's Time in City Hall

By -
  Part 1 - Mr. Smith Goes to City Hall Last year, the city saw an exodus of staff in two of its newest divisions, the office of race, equity and inclusion and the office of performance and innovation, now called The Department of Performance Management and Innovation. Both lost all their staff in 2023. One of those who left in 2023 was Brian K. Smith. In 2016 Smith went from being an outsider fighting city hall to becoming the Director of the new city division aimed at innovation and equity, started by then-mayor Besty Hodges. That ended last year, following a controversial city coordinator appointment, a discrimination complaint, and a lawsuit he and others filed against the city. On July 7, 2023, just a few weeks after retiring from his position working in City Hall, I met with Smith and talked with him about his experience there.  He didn’t expect to get the job when he was hired by Hodges.   “She knew me just like most of the other council members,”...
Read more

Hiawatha Golf Course and Historic Registration

By -
 The future of Hiawatha Golf Course took an interesting turn this January when the city’s historic preservation commission and the park board weighed in on its past.  Both formally responded to a nomination submitted last year to add the golf course to the National Register of Historic Places. The Minneapolis Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) voted to support the nomination of the 140-acre site located at 4553 Longfellow Ave.  The Park Board approved a letter expressing both support and concerns. The nomination was submitted last year by the Bronze Foundation, a nonprofit organization that supports preservation of the 18-hole golf course, who hired Hess, Roise and Company to draft the nomination. The Bronze Foundation also manages the Bronze tournament, formerly called the Upper Midwest Bronze Amateur Open, that has been held regularly at the course since 1954. The application was submitted to the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) on November 4, 2022. T...
Read more

Banning Sofas and Easy Chairs

By -
I want to clarify my position on an ordinance proposed by council member Hofstede regarding furniture in yards and on porches. The specific proposed amendment adds the following language: Any upholstered furniture not manufactured for outdoor use, including upholstered chairs, upholstered couches, and mattresses placed in any front yard, side yard or rear yard abutting a street or on any opened porch exposed to the elements, shall constitute a nuisance condition .” According to discussions at the committee an exposed porch includes any porch that has a roof and railings but it not fully enclosed with windows or screens. I have listened carefully to the concerns and reasoning behind this proposal and can appreciate the good intentions of those who are supporting and bringing this idea forward, but I can't support this proposal as presented. I am willing to support the portion that restricts the use of upholstered furniture (not specifically manufactured for outdoor use) on lawns an...
Read more